correspondent for "the nation" magazine. i'm at dinner last night and reading your tweets at 11:00. will you get some sleep this weekend? do you ever sleep? that's what i want to know. as always, thanks so much. that's "the ed show." tune in tonight at 10:00 p.m. eastern for a replay of the "saturday night live weekend update" special. the "rachel maddow" show starts right now. happy friday. thanks for being with us for this next hour. boy, howdy, what a friday it has been today. all right, i'm going to bottom line it right away. here is i guess the big headline out of today's unexpected friday news dump of mitt romney's 2011 tax returns. here's the big headline. mitt romney says that mitt romney is not qualified to be president. this has been a weird week, a lot of fast moving developments in the presidential campaign,

but i don't think anybody could have predicted the week was going to end like this. back in july during mr. romney's big overseas trip to europe and the middle east, mr. romney sat down with abc news and spoke with them in part about his tax returns, talked with them about why we the people have not been allowed to see many of his tax returns, despite the fact he's been going around the country telling everybody oo lot of this evenings of what's in those returns, he said he's paid all of his taxes, we have to trust him, take his word on that but we're not going to be allowed to see the evidence. >> i have paid all the taxes required by law. i don't pay more than are legally due. frankly, if i had paid more than are legally due, i don't think i'd be qualified to become president. >> if i had paid more than are legally due, i don't think i'd be qualified to become president. nobody who pays a dollar more than they legally owe is qualified to be president.

it's a weird assertion because his own father when he ran for president in 1968 made it public knowledge that as a rich man he had declined to take certain tax deductions that he was legally allowed to take. so was mitt romney saying that his own father was not qualified to be president because he paid some more taxes than he had to? it was a weird thing to assert when he said it in july but it was made all the more weird today. at 3:00 this afternoon, late on a friday of what has been the single worst week of his entire presidential campaign, mr. romney finally released one year of his tax returns, his long awaited, long promised 2011 tax returns. in the return we learn that mitt romney paid an effective tax rate of 14.1%, which is probably lower than you. but that is actually a higher tax rate than he could have paid legally. here's how the romney campaign explains it. quote, the romneys donated $4 million to charity in 2011.

but as can you see here, the romneys claimed a deduction of only $2.25 million for those charitable contributions. so they donated 4 million but only deducted 4 million. in other words mitt romney in 2011 paid more in taxes than was legally due. >> if i had paid more than are legally due, i don't think i'd be qualified to become president. >> ta-da. why would the romney campaign put their candidate in the position of declaring himself unqualified to be president? mitt romney declared to the country in another interview he had never paid less than 13% taxes over the last ten years. he had always paid more than 13% he said. even though he says that, turns out mathematically that was not going to be true in his taxes for this past year in 2011. in order to make that statement from last month retroactively

true, mr. romney's accountants went back and artificially inflated his tax rate so it would comport with what he said. they artificial live inflated his tax rate to more than what it needed to be. and in so doing mitt romney unwittingly declared himself unqualified to be president of the united states. this is nuts. if he simply filed normally, taking the deductions he was legally able to take, he would have paid a lower tax rate than he paid. purely for show he deliberately inflated his tax rate on purpose. on mad o owe blog today it was said mr. romney was in the preferred selection of selecting his own tax rate and then working backwards from there. this is a mess for the romney

campaign. in these new tax returns we learn mr. romney made $13 million in total income last year. aside from the gee whiz factor of his making $13 million a year, even though he hasn't had an actual paying job since 1999, aside from that there is also the fact that even other average millionaires in this country pay way more in taxes than mitt romney pay. your average tax rate for your run of the mill millionaire now is 25%. but mitt romney is a special kind of millionaire. he doesn't pay 25%. he only pays 14.1%. how do you get 10 points below the rate that even the other millionaires are paying? you get that by trying, by working really hard by avoiding taxes. as the wall street journal noted, the romney's main tax return mentions entities based in the cayman islands on at least 28 separate pages. the romney campaign is insisting

those cayman island investments have nothing at all to do with avoiding taxes. maybe the money just likes the nice view. everything we know about his financial history points to his involvement in decades and decades and decades of one tax avoidance scheme after another. this house on gentle bend drive in missouri city, texas. mitt military owns that house. every month the couple who lives in that house makes out a personal check to mitt romney for $600. they don't have their mortgage on that house through a bank. their mortgage is with mitt romney personally. why is mitt romney this one texas couple's mortgage lender? oh, because of a tax avoidance scheme he got involved in back in the 80s that he's still in on. when mitt romney sat on the board of the marriott corporation, marriott took advantage of a bunch of fancy auditing tricks called son of boss. after mitt romney's ten-year on the board ought it committee, marriott ultimately got slopd with tens of millions in fines

from the federal government. that's because son of boss was a criminal tax avoidance scheme. it was also at the center of mr. romney's run for governor of massachusetts in 2002. even though mr. romney told massachusetts voters he had always filed his taxes as massachusetts resident, mr. romney actually had declared his primary residence in utah in what the local paper there described as an attempt as, say it with me now, tax avoidance. mr. romney's olympic dressage horse, not just a hobby for his wife, also a tax avoidance scheme, an attempted $77,000 write-off on his tax returns. his returns also showed investments in switzerland, a swiss bank account where money can also have a very nice view and can be shielded from american taxes. mitt romney's entire adult life has essentially been one long, boring plot to dodge taxes at

one level or another. that's what rich people do, certain kinds of rich people, right? and that's what makes the specifics of his tax returns so exotic and therefore so interesting. that's why people want to see his actual returns for multiple years. they don't necessarily just want to take his word for it. today mr. romney released one year tax returns. the other years still holding back. today they released a summary of 20 years worth of taxes. they're not releasing the tax returns or specific details, just a summary of what tax rate he paid over 20 years. mr. romney has had to release summaries of his financial situation in the past. if you're running for federal office, you have to release personal financial disclosure forms. rick santorum, rick perry, all these guys had to do that. mitt romney over the years in those disclosures has hidden stuff that could have potentially been damning to him. we don't know much about it because he's never release much of the actual tax returns to

compare them with but when he has released tax returns to compare with the summaries, the comparison does not look good. when mr. romney released his tax returns for 2010, the year we had before today, he had already made summary disclosures about his finances for that same year in order to run for office. he'd already filed these personal financial disclosures. but then we got the actual tax returns and you could compare them to those summaries for that same year. it turns out that in the tax returns were listed 20 different investment vehicles that were just never listed in his disclosures, including seven of the 20 that were overseas foreign investment vehicles. commenting on why had it been hidden in his forms, his spokeswoman said at the time that the candidate's failure to include his swiss bank account in earlier financial disclosures was merely a, quote, "trivial inadvertent issue." trivial and inadvertent.

today after months of stalling, mr. romney finally released the one additional year of tax returns he says the american public deserves to see. his vice presidential nominee was required to give him ten years for mr. romney to review but we are only allowed to see two years from mr. romney. what we learned today is that mitt romney is a zillionaire. there are 28 pages discussing investments in the caymans. but the timing is incredible. i understand the campaign's thinking in terms of getting all the bad stuff out at once. well, we're having a bad day anyway, how much worse can it get? it can get worse. it's a little crazy in terms of political strategy here. in the same week we get the new, fresh evidence of mitt romney's life long pursuit of avoiding taxes, we also get to see how he talks about the issues of taxes behind closed doors when he

thinks he only talking to his fellow zillionaire republicans. we also learn what he thinks about the 47% of americans who are not required to pay federal income taxes, who he says sees themselves as victims and cannot be convinced to take personal responsibility or care for their lives. other people paying low taxes disgust him. >> the 47% of the people, these are people who pay no income tax. 47% of americans pay no income tax. >> i think it's a real problem when you have almost half of americans that are not paying income tax. >> that's the real problem. the rest of the country is not paying enough. time for everybody else to do their part. chris hayes joins us in just a moment. but first, one more thing. you want to know how bad the context was in which mitt romney

made the decision he would rather talk about his tax returns today than anything else? consider this -- mr. romney did not just lose tim pawlenty from his campaign this week, look at the travel schedule this week of three three gieruys. chris christie this week was in iowa, which is not part of new jersey. rick santorum also this week, also in iowa. he's going to be back in iowa on monday. he's doing an iowa bus tour. on wednesday of next week where is bobby jindal, the governor of louisiana? not in louisiana. he's also going to iowa. when your own top tier surrogates are saying forget this guy, let's talk 2016 and me, then it is time to change the subject to anything, even to your tax return. and uterine cancers.

i even wrote a play about that. my symptoms were a pain in my abdomen and periods that were heavier and longer than usual for me. if you have symptoms that last two weeks or longer, be brave, go to the doctor. ovarian and uterine cancers are gynecologic cancers. symptoms are not the same for everyone. i got sick...and then i got better. gives you a 50% annual bonus. and everyone, but her... likes 50% more cash. but, i have an idea. do you want a princess dress? yes how about some cupcakes? yes lollipop? yes! do you want an etch a sketch? yes! do you want 50% more cash? no you got talent. [ male announcer ] the capital one cash rewards card. with a 50% annual cash bonus it's the card for people who like more cash. what's in your wallet? i usually say that.

throughout our lives. one a day men's 50+ is a complete multi-vitamin designed for men's health concerns as we age. it has more of 7 antioxidants to support cell health. one a day men's 50+.

i have paid all the taxes required by law. i don't pay more than are legally do. frankly, if i had paid more than are legally due, i don't think i'd be qualified to become president. >> if i had paid more than are legally due, i don't think i'd be qualified to become president, except for this special circumstance that i'm paying more than is legally due because i'd like to become president. joining us is with chris hayes.

chris, thanks you for being here. >> it's great to be here. >> the question that we will get to is the strategy of why now. we will get to that. but substantively mr. romney paid more in taxes than he owed in order to make a statement to abc news from earlier in the summer retroactively true about what he said his tax rate had been. >> here is my favorite part. this is a three act trilogy. act one is he makes this promise, which it's unclear if he could keep. act two is he pays an extra $225,000, which is a lot of money to people, to make that statement true. here's my favorite. he can file an amendment to the return after the election in which he claims that extra $1.6 deduction and get the money back. so the best part of it is that when he's done and if he has lost or even if he's won, he just goes back to the irs and says i'm amending my return. actually, i do want to take that

full deduction on that money. >> the amazing thing will be if he wins -- >> will he do that. >> also notable that mitt romney in 2008, he spent tens and millions in 2008 in his campaign, this time he's contributed essentially $50,000. so this is a loan of $225,000 to the campaign. it's his biggest personal investment in his campaign yet. >> i'm seriously so looking for that press release about filing the amendment the day after the election because what's clear here is and i think it's actually a really interesting set of question. there's a question about what is morally acceptable. forget the law, right. as far as we know, we're in the four square corners of the law. but what do we find to be admirable behavior, what do we find toi be neutral behavior, ad what do we find condemnable. of those 343 pages of his

return, 225 are foreign vehicles that have been created as far as we know solely for the sole purpose to shelter tax income from the government. it's another thing to orient the entire of your income streams, to engineer them from the beginning, to try in the most exotic fashion possible to minimize your taxes. >> the romney line is yes, there's a lot of money in the cayman islands but it's not to avoid taxes. >> i have talked to people at bain. bain says to you when they are recruiting you we structure these deals in ways that will minimize your tax liability. that is one of the pitches of bain, right? you're going to keep an extra 10% of your income, which people like that is correct rig, right? this is just part of the way it works. >> this is also difficult politically speaking because of

what else has happened. there's this hidden camera video in which he's talks about in morally disdainful terms, mr. romney is not paying income taxes because he hasn't had a job so this isn't tax income. so how does that morally interact with the thing that he got caught saying that he's so embarrassed on this week? >> it amplifies the bad message. there is a vision that the right holds that right and conservative plutocrats hold and nonconservative plutocrats and mitt romney holds, which is that the nation is veering towards this point in which these kind of super beings, who are the job creators, who are in some deep core, meta physical sense

different than normal people hold up all society, and if you start attacking them with your petty slings and arrows, the world will fall down. what we see is when you're looking at the actual social contract, those same people who view themselves as the pillars of the society are welching on the social contract, are doing everything in their power to slither out of it, to get themselves out of those obligations and this reaffirms that. >> and the idea that it's inherent in the job creator idea but also in the reason people aren't paying income tax, things like the earned income tax credit, deduction for education and mortgage interest and all these other things were created by the government as ways to encourage those behaviors. if we're not challenging that there ought to be a chimed deduction, we ought not be damning people who collect it and that is -- >> particularly when it was republican policy. our brad malt, the trustee, you

showed his blog post talking about it. this is a reminder of it. when mitt romney has a blind trust, the man who runs his blind trust is his personal attorney. it is not a blind trust in any way that would be recognizable -- >> the veil of ignorance. >> he's a guy who says we can go into a room and say let's make sure we pay 14.1%. that is not a blind trust. >> chris, thank you very. i'm looking forward to your show tomorrow. also trying to regain mojo for the campaign today was paul ryan, who did not have an ideal work day. statistically speaking, you had a better day than paul ryan. that's next. employees are being forced to do more with less. and the need for capable leaders is greater than ever.

when you see these problems do you take a step back, or do you want to dive right in? with a degree in business from capella university, you'll have the knowledge to go further in your career than you ever thought possible. let's get started at capella.edu

his morning starts with arthritis pain. and two pills. afternoon's overhaul starts with more pain. more pills. triple checking hydraulics. the evening brings more pain. so, back to more pills. almost done, when... hang on. stan's doctor recommended aleve. it can keep pain away all day with fewer pills than tylenol. this is rudy. who switched to aleve. and two pills for a day free of pain. ♪ and get the all day pain relief of aleve in liquid gels.

if you are the republican presidential campaign, you have two people on your ticket, right? i have two guys. you also have a very fragile lead in the polls among older voters. you must maintain or increase that lead among seniors if you want any chance of winning the election in november. there's a big speaking engagement coming up in front of the aarp, the american association of retired person, the senior set. the voters you have and must keep. sensitive issue, right? which of your two guys do you spend to the aarp? do you send the old guy, the one

that is 65 years old and famous for being a great businessman with two whole years of tax returns you can see? or do you send the other guy? do you send your senior citizen or the young blue-eyed hyper kinetic ball of green muscle who is mainly famous for wanting to kill medicare or private size social security. old rich guy or young guy with plan to kill medicare? remember, it's aarp. which of your two guys do you send? >> the first step to a stronger medicare is to repeal obama care because it represents the worst of both worlds. [ crowd boos ] >> i had a feeling there would be mixed reaction. >> that didn't sound so mixed. bonuses all around for the staffers who made that decision. more ahead on that. stand by. ♪

why not use all your vacation days this year? get points you can easily redeem for your vacations, with chase sapphire preferred. mom: ready t♪ go to work? ♪ ♪ ♪ every mom needs a little helper. that's why i got a subaru. announcer: love. it's what makes a subaru, a subaru. syou know, i've helped a lot off people save a lot of money. but today...( sfx: loud noise of large metal object hitting the ground)

things have been a little strange. (sfx: sound of piano smashing) roadrunner: meep meep. meep meep? (sfx: loud thud sound) what a strange place. geico®. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance. now we need a little bit more... a little bit more vanilla? this is great! [ male announcer ] at humana, we believe there's never been a better time to share your passions... because the results... are you having fun doing this? yeah. that's a very nice cake! [ male announcer ] well, you can't beat them. [ giggles ] ohh! you got something huh? whoa... [ male announcer ] humana understands the value of spending time together that's a lot of work getting that one in! let's go see the birdies. [ male announcer ] one on one, sharing what you know. let's do it grandpa. that's why humana agents will sit down with you, to listen and understand what's important to you.

it's how we help you choose the right humana medicare plan for you. because when your medicare is taken care of, you can spend more time sharing your passions. wow. [ giggles ] [ male announcer ] with the people who matter most. i love you grandpa! i love you grandma! now you're a real fisherman. [ male announcer ] humana. get two times the points a on dining in restaurants with chase sapphire preferred. the criticism of republican candidate mitt romney from his own side, from republicans, is essentially of two different varieties. there are some people criticizing him for his views, for his campaign message and what he says on hidden camera.

that's mark mckinnon, the george w. bush ad guru say who can support anyone with this view of the country? and another saying mitt romney doesn't know much about the country he inhabits. and that is one variety of republican criticism of mr. romney. a lot of the people who are making that criticism are being derided as not real conservatives by other people on the right. the other variety of criticism is ideological. it's not about there being anything wrong about mr. romney's beliefs or policies, their criticism is just that he's running a bad campaign. when the campaign released more of mitt romney's tax information today, a former romney adviser said at first i thought this was an april fool's joke.

there are 49 -- 40 days left and you have just made more of them about mitt's taxes. and they're trashing their own candidate's ability to run a large organization such as a presidential campaign. the criticism of how mr. romney is campaigning and why he's losing has also focused a lot this week on the schedule, on the fact that he's not campaigning very much. mitt romney's spare campaign schedule worries some republicans. fund-raising trumps rallies in romney's schedule. romney's light campaign schedule has led some gop donors to grumble. gop senators offer romney advice. what's their advice? quote, the nominee should be spend morgue time campaigning in official states. mr. romney was asked about that

criticism, if he's going to do more campaign events and start cam tpaigning harder. mitt romney's response to that was "ha, ha, we're in the stretch, aren't we? look at those clouds, it's beautiful. look at those things. it's such a strange answer, you have to think maybe he's uncomfortable with the premise of the question. are you going to start campaigning harder? is that a disorienting question? even if campaigning nationally for the presidency is an overwhelming thing in the process. the important consequence is it actually makes campaigning less overwhelming at times like this. it's now less of a daunting prospect, less of a difficult question to answer because it's a less complicated answer. as we get closer to the election, the map of places you need to campaign in gets

smaller, not bigger. it's clearer each day which states are in play. campaigns know by now in which counties they need to rack up their big margins. and within those counties the campaigns as they get closer to election day can zero in either further within individual counties, focusing even tighter on which specific voters and which specific counties and which specific states are the ones they need. so presidential candidate at this stage of the race ought to be able to answer that question easily. but technologically how the two sides do that focusing in on the people they think they need to persuade is super interesting and this changes with each election cycle now as the technology of this gets better. just as an example. naral pro voice america, an abortion rights group. they briefed people what they're going to do with their $2.5 million before the election.

they picked out 25 counties and within those 25 specific counties, they have identified to the person 338,020 specific women they believe they need to swer situa persua persuade. naral beliefs they're likely to vote against president obama or not vote at all. they have a very specific message about this election that is targeted to those specific women and they're going to use direct mailers and live phone calls and targeted advertising to try to move them. 338,020 of them and they know exactly who they are. here's another case. everybody knows if you have to pick one swing state to win you would pick florida, right? of all the swing states, florida has the largest number of electoral votes. the polls are tight right now in florida. knowing it's important and knowing you want to win florida

is only about step one and a half in a 20-step process what it takes to win there. who exactly do you have to turn out? who exactly do you have to target? it's empirical questions that have empirical answers. look at the florida polls. look at this pattern. this is the age groups. as the age groups get older, president obama does worse. he does great with younger people but he's losing among older people in florida. if you look at the latest numbers from florida, survey usa, same pattern. as voters get holder, obama does worse. obama is winning overall in each of these polls but his support is totally dependent on specific age groups. up see the exact same pattern in the data from fox news's latest polling. yeah, fox news. mr. romney is winning with older voters. so if you are a political technician and trying to win the state of florida for your

candidate, this polling pattern is not just an interesting fact about how this state is likely to vote. what you are looking at right there is actionable intelligence. what political messaging is going to be most effective for winning this state given these age-specific numbers. again, you do not have to guess. it's an empirical question with an empirical answer. it is in the numbers. look from that same fox news poll. regardless of how you might vote, which presidential candidate do you prust to do a better job on protecting medicare? look at the margin. president obama winning that question in florida by a 13-point margin. so the people who want barack obama to win florida are pressing that advantage right now and the people who want mitt romney to win florida are trying to eliminate the president's advantage on that right now and they are both doing it in an intensely targeted way with this crucial block of older voters in florida that everybody knows they've got to persuade. with that in mind, listen to this radio ad that just started running there.

>> hello? >> jeffrey, it's your mother. >> hey, mom, how are you? >>. >> i'm good. >> what are you doing? >> well, i've been watching tv all day but it's making my head spin. >> what do you have mean? >> all these ads about medicare. it's very confusing. >> okay. i've read about it. what do you want to know? >> well, what's the truth about romney and ryan? >> the romney/ryan plan does essentially end medicare. health insurance what the wall street journal said. >> i don't like the sound of that. >> what i read said seniors would wind up paying over $6,000 more per year. >> that's a fortune to me. >> and romney would make drastic cuts to medicaid, too. two-thirds of seniors rely on medicaid for nursing home care. mom go, to this web site, medicareromneyryan.com and have a look for your son. >> okay, son. take care. >> not authorized by any

candidate or candidate's committee. >> that is how you win florida, right? that's an ad from a union that supports president obama. it's targeting with a really good actress. it's why republicans are fighting on that battleground, too. as they launched that radio ad in florida, the romney campaign launched this tv ad for the same state. >> mitt romney and paul ryan get it. medicare is going broke. that's not politics, it's math. anyone who wants to leave medicare like it is is for letting it go bankrupt. my mother's 8 1 and depends on medicare. we can save medicare without changing hers but only if younger americans accept that our medicare will be different than our parents' when we retire in 30 years. but after all they did for us, isn't that the least we can do? >> i'm mitt romney and i approve

this message. >> you see the problem with the message there? the romney/ryan message in their official campaign there is we need to drastically change medicare. might be okay for people using it now. also i have a mother. i want to throw the word bankrupt out there. if you like medicare, we have serious changes in mind. the democratic message is the republicans want to make serious changes to medicare the republican message is the republicans want to make serious changes to medicare. this doesn't usually happen this way. the republican's campaign verifies and underscores the validity of the democrat's most potent attack with this crucial group of people in this crucial state on this crucial issue. i know that mitt romney approves that message of that ad you just saw but i'll get barack obama approves that message, too. joining us now is karen finney, a former communications director for the democratic party. because i mentioned naral, she

is a board member at naral pro-choice america. you a political pro. what does it mean when one side is running ads saying how scary that side's position is and the other side is saying yeah, we're saying the exact same thing. >> we're saying we all agree the republicans want to make drastic changes to medicare. it goes to the point that you made earlier in the intro here and it goes to partially why we look at things like honest and trutworthiness and shares my values so closely in the polling and that is there's an agreement that republicans want to make a change. the question for voters is who do you trust? if changes have to be made, who do you trust to be the steward of those changes? one of the things we know, republicans have admitted this, they go into that conversation with a deficit, right? democrats largely are more trusted on the issue of medicare than republicans. so they're already starting with

a trust deficit on an issue where they haven't quite locked in on a message frankly that is going to get them even with democrats. as we saw from the aarp response today. >> we played a clip of paul ryan being booed when he was talking about wanting to repeal obama care. he was booed throughout the speech. i once asked nancy pelosi at a live event, when george bush came back after reelection and said he wanted to privatize social security, how did you beat that? she said, well, there was a big fight in washington about whether or not we should put up our own plan for doing something else to social security besides privatizing and i quashed all that, i used my power in washington to say no. we have a plan. we do have a plan on social security. you want to know what it's called? it's called social security. she felt that playing pure defense on that, no, we need to

protect this thing that americans know and love was the way that president bush not only lost that fight but i think it -- it was a part of of the economic reason his second term was scuttled. do you think democrats is something to learn from that here? >> i remember the meetings around that very, very well. again, part of the calculation there is the majority of americans do not trust republicans on this issue. so president bush really put himself out there and then he didn't frankly have an answer that assuaged people's concerns and that's the biggest problem. when you talk about the romney/ryan plan, there are so many gaps that people hear in terms of how will this actually work and that they don't have answers for, which is another pattern with them obviously, that that's part of why they're not able to win on that. part of what democrats are saying is here are the changes, here's what we know about the changes that they want to make and the implications of those changes. romney/ryan don't have an answer for that so that's what hangs in

people's mind when is they're listening to the debate. >> one more technical, i notice that mitt romney is leading in almost no spring state polls but the polls where mr. romney is leading in the swing states are almost invariably polls that stand out because of their methodology. he's leading in polls that use the old methodology of just calling land lines only and ignoring cell phones. he loses in polls that include cell phones and more modern techniques of polling. as a former dnc spokesperson, what do you think that means? >> here's what i think is going on here. when we're talking about generally people who are using land lines, those tend to be what i would consider more traditional republican voters, they're likely to be a little bit older. this tracks with what you were saying in the intro, voters who are likely to be a little buiit

older. voters whose cell phone would be the primary way to contact them tend to be more transient, more diverse. one thing about the way the polling is break down, it's not telling us all the data about the ethnic and demographic changes in the country. barack obama won the state of virginia but he lost the white vote. it was the black vote that made the difference. the polls doesn't capture a dynamic like that. understand there are other things going on underneath that as you pointed out, that's the kind of data that the campaigns are really looking at as they go county by county and state by state. >> karen finney, former communications director forthe democratic party and someone who knows a lot about these things, thank you for being here.

>> thank you. >> one thing that we did that got way, way, way, way more attention and an important follow-up on that story is coming up. and does it launch apps by voice while learning your voice ? launch cab4me. droid does. keep left at the fork. does it do turn-by-turn navigation ? droid does. with verizon, america's largest 4g lte network, and motorola, droid does. get $100 off select motorola 4g lte smartphones like the droid razr. here at the hutchison household. but one dark stormy evening... she needed a good meal and a good family. so we gave her purina cat chow complete. it's the best because it has something for all of our cats! and after a couple of weeks she was part of the family. we're so lucky that lucy picked us. [ female announcer ] purina cat chow complete. and for a delicious way to help maintain a healthy weight,

try new purina cat chow healthy weight. hey, bro. or engaging. conversations help us learn and grow. at wells fargo, we believe you can never underestimate the power of a conversation. it's this exchange of ideas that helps you move ahead with confidence. so when the conversation turns to your financial goals... turn to us. if you need anything else, let me know. [ female announcer ] wells fargo. together we'll go far.

insight into the creation of the rachel maddow show, the whole thing devolves into us all

making jokes and saying things about the news that cannot be said on cable tv. when that happens, somebody usually reins it in by saying "we'll put that on our imagery late night weekend show and cut loose and break all the rules." we don't have that show but fac >> romney did not apologize for his comments though he did say they were not elegantly stated. apparently he meant to say 47% of americans are victims and have a sense of entitlement, m lady. as for it's claim it's not his job, i wouldn't worry, buddy. it's looking less and less like it will be your job. >> that is from the special they did this week. it's called the "weekend update" thursday.

that special is going to air that special is going to air tonight.

let's develop more stars in education. let's invest in our teachers... ...so they can inspire our students. let's solve this.

you misare you sure?et toss. eeeee! yeah. i get all my friends' pics as soon as they take them. really? you just missed an awesome dance off between the dads. oh... wow! (laughing) you just missed the cake fight. seriously? everyone's taking pictures like they're paparazzi. are we missing that? we're not, check it out. aww, yeah, haha. excuse me. vo: get all your friends' photos automatically with share shot on the galaxy s3.

hey! first dance! are you kidding me??? one of the main reasons barack obama is president of the united states right now is because he was against the iraq war from the start. as a stat senator he spoke out against the invasion saying he was not against all war, he was against that war. he was never against the war in afghanistan, though. he quickly made clear he would end the war in iraq and he made clear that the war in afghanistan would grow. he announced a surge of tens of thousands of troops into afghanistan putting more americans there than george w. bush ever did. but the president insisted that would not last forever. he said that had to be over by roughly now. by the end of september, 2012. so now, a little ahead of

schedule, the pentagon has announced that the surge into afghanistan is over. there have been as many as 100,000 americans in afghanistan it is now down to 68 thousand which frankly is still a huge number. especially when you consider how little political attention those 68,000 americans get. the war in afghanistan isn't an issue mostly because of the one of the two sides did not want to talk about it. it didn't come up in his speech because it wasn't just a laundry list of issues, it was for things that he thinks are important. as in not the war. so our war is not a major issue in our presidential race and that is a convenient reason to never really talk about it. there's one thing i want to point out and it is a small thing but i think it illustrates an important and widely misconstrued, misunderstood thing about what americans care

about and what politicians might find really rewarding to talk about. and frankly, what the media might find if we all chose to cover this more. the war, the people fighting and war and how those people get treated when they come home. here it is. in addition to this tv show, we have a website. it's our blog, really. we also have a facebook page. we post six, seven, eight things a day on our facebook page. so just as an example, here's something we posted this week. now, take a look at this. this line here, that's the number of people who liked that post. who clucked the thumbs up and told their facebook friends they liked what we posted. this number right here, that's the number of people who have commented on the post. anybody can comment on anything we post. and we really do read the comments. that right there is the number time people shared this thing

about tim pawlenty with their friends. they reposted what we posted. it can go from living on our page to your page with a click of that button. these are all important metrics about how people think how valuable it is to know these things. the pawlenty quoting the campaign is very popular. that's cool, right? so a lot of people telling other people that some piece of news they got from us was interesting and useful and other people should know about it too. and it happens like that a lot. for about the last month, an average facebook post from us got about 3800 likes, those were our monthly averages until wednesday. and this is what i'm getting at. on wednesday, republicans in the snoot blocked a veterans jobs bill that was paid for, five republicans across the aisle to vote with it with the democrats

but the rest of the senators voted against it including four particular senators who had written parts of it themselves but then they voted no on jobs for veterans. we reported this here on this tv, we wrote about it on the blog and posted it on facebook. those were our monthly average numbers before wednesday. here's what happened when we posted on facebook about republicans killing this veterans jobs bill. are you ready? that post got about four times as many likes facebook-wide as usual. it got 15 times the number of comments. it got 16 times more people shared that post on to their facebook pages from ours. remember, our average numbers over the last month are especially high because of the political conventions, and yet republicans killing the veterans jobs bill, that blew almost everything else we have ever done out of the water. we know generally if people are

paying attention to stuff we produce for this tv show by our overall ratings. but in terms of getting specific, in terms of seeing and measuring the impact and your interest in one specific story, this is shocking. i know there is a presidential campaign going on right now and i know it is burning white hot. but i can quantitatively show you that there is genuine interest in this country about how we are treating the men and woman coming home from these longest wars in american history. it is not my impression. it is an empirical fact. people don't just care about a story like this, they want to share it with their friends they want to scream it from the roof tops. to my friends in the media i say don't cover stories like this because you're trying to make a statement. cover the war and the military because you are an ambitious